RE: In response to the person in 'OR' - (Observable Reality (not Oregon))
Reply to: comm-668578199@craigslist.org
Date: 2008-05-05, 10:59AM CDT
First of all, to clear things up, I am from right here in KC, not Oregon. When I put OR, I am meaning the initials for my moniker Observable Reality as that is the "specific location" that my posts are coming from. I guess I just assumed that you people were smart enough to realize that when I put OR, I meant Observable Reality. Guess I gave you too much credit.
Secondly, the conclusion you drew when comparing those statements is wrong. Allow me to dumb it down for you:
Statement: "If you are an intelligent, rational human being, all of the examples mentioned above show you that the God of the Bible is imaginary."
Meaning: Since it is assumed that you are an intelligent, rational human being, you should be able to work through these logical explanations and rationalizations and come to the conclusion that God is imaginary. There is really no other way to explain the things brought up by those 5 posts.
HOWEVER, some people are still intelligent but refuse to accept these logical truths for one reason or another. It makes no statement that if you are intelligent you MUST realize that God is imaginary, it just states that you should. Like I have said, intelligent people that claim to believe in God often are just holding onto religion because it is A) how they were raised or B) for tradition's sake.
Work on your reading comprehension skills please.
- Location: Observable Reality (not Oregon)
- it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 668578199